Abstract

Early stone tools, and in particular sharp stone tools, arguably represent one of the most important technological milestones in human evolution. The production and use of sharp stone tools significantly widened the ecological niche of our ancestors, allowing them to exploit novel food resources. However, despite their importance, it is still unclear how these early lithic technologies emerged and which behaviours served as stepping-stones for the development of systematic lithic production in our lineage. One approach to answer this question is to collect comparative data on the stone tool making and using abilities of our closest living relatives, the great apes, to reconstruct the potential stone-related behaviours of early hominins. To this end, we tested both the individual and the social learning abilities of five orangutans to make and use stone tools. Although the orangutans did not make sharp stone tools initially, three individuals spontaneously engaged in lithic percussion, and sharp stone pieces were produced under later experimental conditions. Furthermore, when provided with a human-made sharp stone, one orangutan spontaneously used it as a cutting tool. Contrary to previous experiments, social demonstrations did not considerably improve the stone tool making and using abilities of orangutans. Our study is the first to systematically investigate the stone tool making and using abilities of untrained, unenculturated orangutans showing that two proposed pre-requisites for the emergence of early lithic technologies-lithic percussion and the recognition of sharp-edged stones as cutting tools-are present in this species. We discuss the implications that ours and previous great ape stone tool experiments have for understanding the initial stages of lithic technologies in our lineage.

Highlights

  • Given their resilience to destructive taphonomic processes, the most abundant hominin artefacts in the archaeological record are stone tools

  • In the present study we report spontaneous lithic percussion as well as directed lithic percussion following demonstrations in captive, unenculturated orangutans

  • Lithic percussion led in two different occasions to the detachment of sharp stone/concrete pieces

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given their resilience to destructive taphonomic processes, the most abundant hominin artefacts in the archaeological record are stone tools. Some of the oldest sharp stone tools excavated [e.g. from the Oldowan technocomplex; 12] show evidence of raw material selectivity [13,14,15,16] as well as technological skill underlying their production [16, 17] These findings have led researchers to postulate potential evolutionary scenarios to explain the initial steps in the emergence of early stone technologies [18, 19]. One such scenario proposes that the production and use of sharp-edged stones was preceded by stone tool percussion techniques that involved the use of one or several unmodified stones [20,21,22]. Assuming the existence of such preceding techniques for the production of sharp-edged stones seems sensible given that several species of extant wild non-human primates (capuchin monkeys, Sapajus spp.; long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis; and chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus) customarily use lithic percussion techniques to access a variety of food resources [reviewed by 24– 29]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call