Experimental Investigation of a Large Tilting-Pad Journal Bearing—Comparison of a Flooded and Non-Flooded Design

Abstract

In tilting-pad journal bearings (TPJB), power loss corresponds to the internal friction in the shearing of the oil. Besides the lubrication gap, intermediate spaces between the pads account for a notable amount of frictional losses. Against the background of increasing demands for efficiency and sustainable use of resources, the reduction of power loss takes a key position in the further development of bearings. In our research, we compare two bearing lubrication concepts of a five-pad TPJB. Our objective is to work out the influence of different lubrication methods and bearing housing designs on the bearing operation characteristics. We conduct experimental testing of a 500 mm TPJB in two different bearing configurations with respect to the lubrication concept: an oil-flooded and non-flooded bearing design. In the flooded bearing design, oil is supplied via spray-bars and axial seals ensure the inter-pad spaces to be completely filled with oil. The non-flooded design comes without axial seals but oil drain channels to avoid oil accumulation in the bearing. In the latter design, oil is fed in via leading edge grooves (LEG). For the non-flooded bearing design, the experimental data show that the unloaded pads are not completely filled with oil and therefore, no pressure build-up occurs. The absence of additional load on the lower pads compared to the flooded design results in an increase of minimum film thickness. With the non-flooded design, power loss at high speeds is reduced to almost half. As a result, the efficiency of the entire turbomachinery application can be considerably improved.