Experimental identification of chemical carcinogens, risk evaluation, and animal-to-animal correlations.

Abstract

Experimental methods for the identification of chemical carcinogens have been extensively developed, including animal bioassay methods, animal models for cancer induction at major organ sites, models for the study of the effects of carcinogens in cells and tissues in culture and methods for the study of molecular events (metabolic activation, binding and detoxification of carcinogens; DNA damage and repair; mutagenicity). Current sources of documentation on carcinogenicity data are reviewed. The number of "known carcinogens" will vary considerably, depending on the criteria adopted for accepting evidence of carcinogenicity. CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF RISKS, BENEFITS, AND TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES FOR PUBLIC POLICY ON ENVIRONMENTAL CARCINOGENS ARE REVIEWED AND THE FOLLOWING STEPS DISCUSSED: registration of environmental chemical carcinogens and their uses; risk evaluation (considering sources, adequacy, quality and limits of the evidence; quantitative dose-response extrapolation within the same biological system; and species and model conversion factors); benefits evaluation; analysis of technological alternatives; comparative judgment and decision; open public documentation. The problem of animal-to-human correlations is considered, particularly for respiratory carcinogenesis. A laboratory approach is reviewed which includes: development and study of whole animal models for carcinogenesis, analysis of animal tissue responses to carcinogens in vivo and through in vitro culture methods for morphological and biochemical studies, and development of in vitro culture methods for human target tissues. This approach is aimed at providing an experimentally controlled and quantifiable method for the correlation of animal and human observations in carcinogenesis.