Abstract

Food limitation may interact with nest predation and influence nesting patterns, such as breeding season length and renesting intervals. If so, reproductive effort should change with food availability. Thus, when food is limited, birds should have fewer attempts and shorter seasons than when food is not limiting. Here we experimentally test that increased food availability results in increased reproductive effort in a fragmented landscape in the Variable Antshrike (Thamnophilus caerulescens) in southern Brazil. We followed nesting pairs in a naturally fragmented habitat and experimentally supplemented food for half of those pairs. Birds were seen, but evidence of nesting was never found in two small fragments, even though these fragments were larger than individual territories. Pairs with supplemented food were more likely to increase clutch size from two to three eggs and tended to renest sooner (20 d on average) than control pairs. Also, fragment size was associated with breeding patterns, although fragment replicates were unavailable. Nest duration, nest success and breeding season length were all greater, while renesting intervals were shorter, in the largest fragments. Simulations showed that only the largest fragments were able to have a net production of young. Food availability clearly influenced reproductive effort and as a consequence, because of the interaction with predation risk, forest fragments of varying sizes will have complex reproductive dynamics.

Highlights

  • Nest predation is the greatest cause of nesting failure among open nesting passerine birds and is likely to have influenced avian life-history evolution (Nice, 1957; Skutch, 1949; Skutch, 1985; Ricklefs, 1969; Ricklefs, 2000a; Ricklefs, 2000b; Roper, Sullivan & Ricklefs, 2010)

  • Lower food abundance can result in fewer renesting attempts following predation (Rolland, Danchin & Defraipont, 1998; Roper, Sullivan & Ricklefs, 2010; Zanette et al, 2011) and more food may increase nesting success since both young and parents may be well-fed by fewer trips to the nest, thereby reducing the potential effect of visitation rate on predation risk (Holmes et al, 1992; Kuituken & Makinen, 1993; Soler & Soler, 1996; Martin et al, 2011)

  • We examine nesting success and experimentally manipulated food abundance in a fragmented landscape to test for the importance of food abundance and predation risk and their interactions in a subtropical understory-nesting bird, the Variable Antshrike (Thamnophilus caerulescens, Vieillot, 1816) in southern Brazil

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nest predation is the greatest cause of nesting failure among open nesting passerine birds and is likely to have influenced avian life-history evolution (Nice, 1957; Skutch, 1949; Skutch, 1985; Ricklefs, 1969; Ricklefs, 2000a; Ricklefs, 2000b; Roper, Sullivan & Ricklefs, 2010). Lower food abundance can result in fewer renesting attempts following predation (Rolland, Danchin & Defraipont, 1998; Roper, Sullivan & Ricklefs, 2010; Zanette et al, 2011) and more food may increase nesting success since both young and parents may be well-fed by fewer trips to the nest, thereby reducing the potential effect of visitation rate on predation risk (Holmes et al, 1992; Kuituken & Makinen, 1993; Soler & Soler, 1996; Martin et al, 2011). Experimentally increased food abundance may reduce the incubation period (if it is flexible and not genetically constrained), and reduce nest predation (because of fewer trips to and from the nest), increase growth rates and permit additional nesting attempts in species that usually have only one successful nest per year (Martin, 1987; Davis & Graham, 1991; Meijer & Drent, 1999; Castro et al, 2003; Roper, Sullivan & Ricklefs, 2010)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call