Abstract
Aggregation is commonly thought to improve animals' security. Within aquatic ecosystems, group-living prey can learn about immediate threats using cues perceived directly from predators, or from collective behaviours, for example, by reacting to the escape behaviours of companions. Combining cues from different modalities may improve the accuracy of prey antipredatory decisions. In this study, we explored the sensory modalities that mediate collective antipredatory responses of herring (Clupea harengus) when in a large school (approximately 60 000 individuals). By conducting a simulated predator encounter experiment in a semi-controlled environment (a sea cage), we tested the hypothesis that the collective responses of herring are threat-sensitive. We investigated whether cues from potential threats obtained visually or from the perception of water displacement, used independently or in an additive way, affected the strength of the collective avoidance reactions. We modified the sensory nature of the simulated threat by exposing the herring to 4 predator models differing in shape and transparency. The collective vertical avoidance response was observed and quantified using active acoustics. The combination of sensory cues elicited the strongest avoidance reactions, suggesting that collective antipredator responses in herring are mediated by the sensory modalities involved during threat detection in an additive fashion. Thus, this study provides evidence for magnitude-graded threat responses in a large school of wild-caught herring which is consistent with the “threat-sensitive hypothesis”.
Highlights
Schooling behaviour has been considered primarily as an adaptation that confers security advantages to gregarious fishes [1,2,3] through the action of several mechanisms such as a greater power of predator detection [4,5], the numerical dilution of risk and abatement effect [1], predator confusion [6,7] or coordinated evasive manoeuvres [1,8]
Schooling fish can learn about immediate threats using visual [10,11], chemical [12,13] acoustical or hydraulic cues, sensed by the mechanoreceptors located in the lateral line system, that emanate from the predator’s swimming movement [14,15] or indirectly from the sensory information produced by the avoidance behaviour of risk-aware school members [16,17]
Our results show that herring collective antipredator responses are mediated by the sensory modalities involved during threat detection
Summary
Schooling behaviour has been considered primarily as an adaptation that confers security advantages to gregarious fishes [1,2,3] through the action of several mechanisms such as a greater power of predator detection [4,5], the numerical dilution of risk and abatement effect [1], predator confusion [6,7] or coordinated evasive manoeuvres [1,8]. Schooling fish can learn about immediate threats using visual [10,11], chemical [12,13] acoustical or hydraulic cues, sensed by the mechanoreceptors located in the lateral line system, that emanate from the predator’s swimming movement [14,15] or indirectly from the sensory information produced by the avoidance behaviour of risk-aware school members [16,17]. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain an efficient transmission of undamped information within schools: waves of agitation [19,20,21], fast pressure pulses emitted by startled fish [22], and compressional density waves that can occur over very large distances, e.g. 10’s to 100’s of km [21,23]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.