Abstract

This study aims at evaluating the performance of thiamine as a new eco-friendly shale inhibitor in water-based drilling fluids (WBDFs). The evaluation experiments include sedimentation, bentonite inhibition, filtration, zeta potential, thermal gravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, shale cuttings recovery, linear swelling and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The performance of thiamine was compared to potassium chloride. In contrast to deionized water, the aqueous solution of thiamine exhibited greater power to inhibit montmorillonite (Mt) dispersion, much more Mt loading capacity (280 g/L) and fluid loss, lower Mt mass loss, larger aggregated Mt particles, lower interlayer space of the Mt particles, less shale cuttings disintegration and lower linear swelling. Adsorption of thiamine on Mt led to a significant shift in the value of zeta potential (from −17.1 to +8.54 mV). Thiamine demonstrated superior inhibitive performance than potassium chloride. FTIR analysis confirmed that thiamine is adsorbed on Mt particles. The compatibility test revealed the compatibility of thiamine with conventional WBDF additives. It was concluded that the main probable inhibition mechanisms of thiamine are the cation exchange and Mt surface coating. In view of its prominent inhibition capacity and great environmental acceptability, thiamine is a promising inhibitor for drilling in water-sensitive formations.

Highlights

  • Drilling a well is the first stage and one of most costly stages of oil and gas production (Diaz-Perez et al 2007)

  • The deposition behavior of sodium bentonite in the presence of thiamine is shown in Figs. 2 and 3 for the non-prehydrated and prehydrated sodium bentonite particles, respectively

  • The results showed that the sedimentation rate increases by increasing the concentration of thiamine

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Drilling a well is the first stage and one of most costly stages of oil and gas production (Diaz-Perez et al 2007). The annual waste of money is estimated to be about $ 1 billion due to instability of oil and gas wells (Zeynali 2012). Design of a stable well is one of the important factors in the success of drilling operations (Cheatham Jr 1984; Fam and Dusseault 1998). Most researchers believe that the mechanisms of instability of wells are divided into two categories: mechanical effects and physicochemical effects (Tan et al 1996; Osuji et al 2008; Zeynali 2012). The mechanical effects are directly caused by drilling operations, which include the effects of drilling on the wall of the well (Zhu and Liu 2013).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.