Abstract

Establishing species distribution and population trends are basic requirements in conservation biology, yet acquiring this fundamental information is often difficult. Indirect survey methods that rely on fecal pellets (scats) can overcome some difficulties but present their own challenges. In particular, variation in scat detectability and decay rate can introduce biases. We studied how vegetation communities affect the detectability and decay rate of scats as exemplified by koalasPhascolarctos cinereus: scat detectability was highly and consistently dependent on ground layer complexity (introducing up to 16% non-detection bias); scat decay rates were highly heterogeneous within vegetation communities; exposure of scats to surface water and rain strongly accelerated scat decay rate and finally, invertebrates were found to accelerate scat decay rate markedly, but unpredictably. This last phenomenon may explain the high variability of scat decay rate within a single vegetation community. Methods to decrease biases should be evaluated when planning scat surveys, as the most appropriate method(s) will vary depending on species, scale of survey and landscape characteristics. Detectability and decay biases are both stronger in certain vegetation communities, thus their combined effect is likely to introduce substantial errors in scat surveys and this could result in inappropriate and counterproductive management decisions.

Highlights

  • Knowledge of species abundance and distribution must underpin rational conservation and management decisions [1]

  • We studied how vegetation communities affect the detectability and decay rate of scats as exemplified by koalas Phascolarctos cinereus: scat detectability was highly and consistently dependent on ground layer complexity; scat decay rates were highly heterogeneous within vegetation communities; exposure of scats to surface water and rain strongly accelerated scat decay rate and invertebrates were found to accelerate scat decay rate markedly, but unpredictably

  • We demonstrated that scat detectability varied with ground layer complexity, with up to 16% variation in the proportion of scats detected between plots of different ground layer complexities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge of species abundance and distribution must underpin rational conservation and management decisions [1] Acquiring such critical information is far from a trivial undertaking [2, 3]. This is true for cryptic animals (especially when they occur at low densities) [4], for which there is often a need to use indirect survey methods [5]. Scat surveys are often used to determine habitat preferences and predict habitat quality (e.g., [10, 11]) and are commonly used for monitoring endangered wildlife [12] or managing game species [13]. Variability of both scat detectability and decay rate has led to the expression of concerns regarding the reliability of such surveys [14]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call