Abstract

We investigated the longitudinal positional dependence of CT number in 320-row Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) volume scan (320-row volume scan) using a simple geometric phantom (SGP) and a chest simulation phantom (CSP) in order to evaluate its effect on proton range calculation. The SGP consisted of lung substitute material (LSM) and a cylindrical phantom (CP) made of high-density polyethylene. The CSP was an anthropomorphic phantom similar to the human chest. The two phantoms were scanned using 320-row volume scan in various longitudinal positions from the central beam axis. In experiments using the SGP, an image blur at the boundary of the two materials became gradually evident when the LSM was placed far away from the beam central axis. The image blur of the phantom was consistent with the gradation in CT number. The maximum difference in CT numbers between the 64-row helical scan and 320-row volume scan at the boundary of the two materials was consistent with approximately 50% of the relative proton stopping power. In contrast, the CT number profile in each longitudinal position was fairly consistent and longitudinal positional dependence rarely occurred in the CSP experiments. Pass lengths of CT beams through areas with widely different electron densities were shorter, and thus did not significantly impact CT numbers. Based on findings from the CSP experiments, we considered 320-row volume scan to be feasible for proton range calculation in clinical settings, although the relatively large longitudinal positional dependence of CT number should be accounted for when doing so.

Highlights

  • 320-row Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) volume scan (320-row volume scan) has 320 detector rows in the longitudinal direction, which enables a scan with a width of 16 cm (±8 cm from the beam central axis) at 0.275 s/rotation

  • We investigated the longitudinal positional dependence of CT number in 320-row Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) volume scan (320-row volume scan) using a simple geometric phantom (SGP) and a chest simulation phantom (CSP) in order to evaluate its effect on proton range calculation

  • The maximum difference in CT numbers between the 64-row helical scan and 320-row volume scan at the boundary of the two materials was consistent with approximately 50% of the relative proton stopping power

Read more

Summary

Introduction

320-row Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) volume scan (320-row volume scan) has 320 detector rows in the longitudinal direction, which enables a scan with a width of 16 cm (±8 cm from the beam central axis) at 0.275 s/rotation. Only a few studies have reported on the use of 320-row volume scan for motion assessment of a moving target in radiation therapy planning [6]. 320-row volume scan has the potential to obtain more accurate 4DCT images than helical or conventional CT, and may be useful in 4D proton treatment planning. The large cone angle of 320-row volume scan may affect the CT image, especially in areas distant from the beam central axis. These factors may cause inaccurate image reconstruction [8]. In this study, we investigated the longitudinal positional dependence of CT number in 320-row volume scan using two types of phantoms in order to evaluate its effects on proton range calculation

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call