Abstract

Hunting with wire snares is rife within many tropical forest systems, and constitutes one of the severest threats to a wide range of vertebrate taxa. As for all threats, reliable monitoring of snaring levels is critical for assessing the relative effectiveness of management interventions. However, snares pose a particular challenge in terms of tracking spatial or temporal trends in their prevalence because they are extremely difficult to detect, and are typically spread across large, inaccessible areas. As with cryptic animal targets, any approach used to monitor snaring levels must address the issue of imperfect detection, but no standard method exists to do so. We carried out a field experiment in Keo Seima Wildlife Reserve in eastern Cambodia with the following objectives: (1) To estimate the detection probably of wire snares within a tropical forest context, and to investigate how detectability might be affected by habitat type, snare type, or observer. (2) To trial two sets of sampling protocols feasible to implement in a range of challenging field conditions. (3) To conduct a preliminary assessment of two potential analytical approaches to dealing with the resulting snare encounter data. We found that although different observers had no discernible effect on detection probability, detectability did vary between habitat type and snare type. We contend that simple repeated counts carried out at multiple sites and analyzed using binomial mixture models could represent a practical yet robust solution to the problem of monitoring snaring levels both inside and outside of protected areas. This experiment represents an important first step in developing improved methods of threat monitoring, and such methods are greatly needed in southeast Asia, as well as in as many other regions.

Highlights

  • The use of snares is one of the simplest but most effective hunting techniques practised in the tropics (Fa & Brown, 2009)

  • We found that different observers had no discernible effect on detection probability, detectability did vary between habitat type and snare type

  • Snare lines were more conspicuous than single snares and this is reflected in their higher detection probability in both habitat types, and in dense evergreen forest where single snares are especially difficult to pick out

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of snares is one of the simplest but most effective hunting techniques practised in the tropics (Fa & Brown, 2009). Despite the threat posed to mammals by this form of hunting (Corlett, 2007; Harrison et al, 2016), reliable assessments of snaring prevalence within protected areas are practically nonexistent. | 1779 and failure to account for imperfect detection within sample plots. This is because snares share many of the characteristics of the species they target; they are habitat specific, extremely difficult to detect, and occur in remote, inaccessible areas. Just as for rare species in the tropics, traditional methods to obtain unbiased population estimates are extremely difficult to implement in these conditions

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call