Experimental displacement patterns in a 2 × 2 quadrant block with permeability and wettability heterogeneities—problems for numerical modelling

Abstract

The effect of heterogeneities on miscible and immiscible flood displacements in 2D bead packs in quadrant form, 2 × 2 block heterogeneity, with either a permeability or a wettability contrast is the subject of this paper. The physical processes occurring during miscible and immiscible flow and displacement within permeability and wettability quadrant bead pack models have been studied experimentally. This geometry occurs in a number of situations relevant to hydrocarbon production: particularly faults where adjacent rocks have large permeability contrasts with rapid changes, in the laboratory with core butting, in reservoir simulation where grid blocks have different permeability and in reservoirs having near-wellbore damage problems. The model quadrants 1–4, had 1 and 4 and 2 and 3 with identical properties, either in permeability or wettability. Reported are complete unit mobility miscible displacements, then the effects of viscosity differences (mobility modifiers) and finally immiscible displacements on displacement patterns for initial linear injection. The experiments demonstrate that nodal flow occurs for both miscible and immiscible flow, but for immiscible flow there are boundary effects due to capillary pressure differences created by water saturation changes or wettability contrasts which can leave patches of isolated fluid within a quadrant. The displacement patterns for the different models and fluids change significantly with the viscosity and wettability changes, particularly for the immiscible displacements. This is due to the changing capillary pressure between the quadrant blocks as the water saturation change. These are difficult to address in numerical modelling but should be accounted for. Other effects include coupling of all physical processes governing the flow through the node and creations of microzones of trapped residual oil. Our displacement patterns can therefore be a valuable verification benchmark tool for numerical modelling and a calibration data source for those wishing to simulate the effects of capillary pressure under differing wettability conditions and for those investigating upscaling modelling procedures. However, the possible loss of physical reality when averaging must always be considered.