Abstract

Process parameters in Additive Manufacturing (AM) are key factors in the mechanical performance of 3D-printed parts. In order to study their effect, a three-zone model based on the printing pattern was developed. This modelization distinguished three different zones of the 3D-printed part, namely cover, contour, and inner; each zone was treated as a different material. The cover and contour zones were characterized via uniaxial tensile tests and the inner zones via computational homogenization. The model was then validated by means of bending tests and their corresponding computational simulations. To reduce the number of required characterization experiments, a relationship between the raw and 3D-printed material was established by dimensional analysis. This allowed describing the mechanical properties of the printed part with a reduced set of the most influential non-dimensional relationships. The influence on the performance of the parts of inter-layer adhesion was also addressed in this work via the characterization of samples made of Polycarbonate Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS/PC), a polymeric material well known for its poor adhesion strength. It was concluded that by using this approach, the number of required testing configurations could be reduced by two thirds, which implies considerable cost savings.

Highlights

  • In recent years, the field of the Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing has experienced an uninterrupted rise [1]

  • The influence on the performance of the parts of inter-layer adhesion was addressed in this work via the characterization of samples made of Polycarbonate Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS/PC), a polymeric material well known for its poor adhesion strength

  • This work was focused on Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), called Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), which is one of the best established AM technologies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The field of the Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing has experienced an uninterrupted rise [1]. It has been shown that these properties strongly depend on the manufacturing process parameters [11,12], but this dependency is not yet fully understood This lack of knowledge regarding the process properties’ dependency increases the printing randomness and causes a dispersion of the mechanical properties of the final printed parts [13], making the FFF technology less attractive from the industrial point of view. This issue has been extensively studied in recent years.

Material Characterization
Testing direction
Experimental Procedure
Uniaxial Tensile Tests
Bending Tests
Multiscale Computational Homogenization
Ωμ σμ dΩ
Homogenization
Experimental Validation
Dimensional Analysis on the Three-Zone Model
H-10 H-20 H-50 V-10 V-20 V-50
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.