Abstract
Measurement of available bandwidth in a network has always been a topic of great interest. This knowledge can be applied to a wide variety of applications and can be instrumental in providing quality of service to end users. Several probe-based tools have been proposed to measure available bandwidth in wired networks. However, the performance of these tools in the realm of wireless networks has not been evaluated extensively. In recent years, there has also been some work on estimating bandwidth in wireless networks via passively monitoring the channel and determining the 'busy' and 'idle' periods. However, such techniques have primarily been evaluated via simulations only. In this work, we perform an extensive experimental comparison study of both passive and active bandwidth estimation tools for 802.11-based wireless mesh networks. We investigate the impact of interference, packet loss, and 802.11 rate-adaptation, on the performance of these tools. Our results indicate that for wireless networks, a passive technique provides much greater accuracy than the probe-based tools.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
