Abstract

Latent heat storage units for refrigeration processes are promising as alternatives to water/glycol-based storage due to their significantly higher energy densities, which would lead to more compact and potentially more cost-effective storages. In this study, important thermophysical properties of five phase change material (PCM) candidates are determined in the temperature range between −22 and −35 °C and their compatibility with relevant metals and polymers is investigated. The goal is to complement existing scattered information in literature and to apply a consistent testing methodology to all PCMs, to enable a more reliable comparison between them. More specifically, the enthalpy of fusion, melting point, density, compatibility with aluminum, copper, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), neoprene and butyl rubber, are experimentally determined for 1-heptanol, n-decane, propionic acid, NaCl/water mixtures, and Al(NO3)3/water mixtures. The results of the investigations reveal individual strengths and weaknesses of the five candidates. Further, 23.3 wt.% NaCl in water stands out for its very high volumetric energy density and n-decane follows with a lower energy density but better compatibility with surrounding materials and supercooling performance. The importance of using consistent methodologies to determine thermophysical properties when the goal is to compare PCM performance is highlighted.

Highlights

  • 48 Terawatt-hours of the European Union final energy demand are dedicated to process cooling at temperatures below 0 ◦ C [1]

  • Thermal storage has been identified as a technology that could decrease the installation cost of refrigeration and cooling systems [3], increase the efficiency and operation cost of refrigeration applications [4], and support the integration of renewables in refrigeration processes [5]

  • Latent heat storage for refrigeration processes is promising as an alternative to water/glycol-based storage due to their much higher energy densities (>4 times) which would lead to more compact and potentially more cost-effective storage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

48 Terawatt-hours of the European Union final energy demand are dedicated to process cooling at temperatures below 0 ◦ C [1]. The vast majority of this cooling demand is covered by means of compression cooling using electricity as the energy carrier [2]. This includes the chemical, pharmaceutical, food, and transportation sectors. The state of the art, in commercial refrigeration processes, are sensible storage solutions based on water/glycol mixtures [6]. This technology, even though well established, has various disadvantages, such as: low energy density and high storage volumes, high cost, and potential limitations in power input and output if mass flow rate restrictions need to be applied to increase stratification efficiency [7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call