Abstract

Narrow residence time distributions (RTDs) are desirable in many chemical engineering processes. However, when a system operates in the laminar flow regime, significant fluid dynamic dispersion takes place. This problem is often encountered in micro and millifluidic devices. Exploiting the beneficial effects of secondary flow and chaotic advection, so-called coiled flow inverters (CFIs) are a promising solution for the reduction of fluid dynamic dispersion. These devices, however, have not been extensively used due to the lack of experimental data and of correlations relating the design parameters and operating conditions to the amount of axial dispersion. In this work, we investigated RTDs in micro and millifluidic devices using step input injection and UV–vis inline spectroscopy for the detection of the concentration of a tracer. Experiments were performed for different operating conditions and geometries. Helically coiled tubes (HCTs) were similarly characterized. Dispersion data were expressed in terms of an axial dispersion coefficient and an empirical correlation was derived. The experimental results show that lower axial dispersion is achieved in CFIs as compared to HCTs and straight tubes.

Highlights

  • In micro and millifluidic devices, the flow behavior is dictated by viscous forces rather than inertial forces, as a result of low operating Reynolds numbers (Squires and Quake, 2005)

  • This study focuses on coiled flow inverters (CFIs) and Helically coiled tubes (HCTs), not on straight pipes; there is no guarantee that the axial dispersion model (that is, Eqs. (2.8) and (2.9)) should hold and that an axial dispersion coefficient can be used to quantify the axial dispersion in these systems

  • The residence time distributions (RTDs) curves measured experimentally were fitted with the analytical solutions of the axial dispersion model (ADM) (Eqs. (2.8) and (2.9))

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In micro and millifluidic devices, the flow behavior is dictated by viscous forces rather than inertial forces, as a result of low operating Reynolds numbers (Squires and Quake, 2005). Split and recombination, and flow focusing are examples of passive micromixers designed to shorten mixing times (Hessel et al, 2005; Nguyen and Wu, 2005). These are effective tools in applications in which fast mixing between different streams is required. Approaching plug-flow behavior is required for a wide range of chemical reactions as well as for the synthesis of nano and microparticles (Marre and Jensen, 2010)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call