Abstract

Pathology has not been observed in true seals infected with Brucella pinnipedialis. A lack of intracellular survival and multiplication of B. pinnipedialis in hooded seal (Cystophora cristata) macrophages in vitro indicates a lack of chronic infection in hooded seals. Both epidemiology and bacteriological patterns in the hooded seal point to a transient infection of environmental origin, possibly through the food chain. To analyse the potential role of fish in the transmission of B. pinnipedialis, Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) were injected intraperitoneally with 7.5 x 107 bacteria of a hooded seal field isolate. Samples of blood, liver, spleen, muscle, heart, head kidney, female gonads and feces were collected on days 1, 7, 14 and 28 post infection to assess the bacterial load, and to determine the expression of immune genes and the specific antibody response. Challenged fish showed an extended period of bacteremia through day 14 and viable bacteria were observed in all organs sampled, except muscle, until day 28. Neither gross lesions nor mortality were recorded. Anti-Brucella antibodies were detected from day 14 onwards and the expression of hepcidin, cathelicidin, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-10, and interferon (IFN)-γ genes were significantly increased in spleen at day 1 and 28. Primary mononuclear cells isolated from head kidneys of Atlantic cod were exposed to B. pinnipedialis reference (NCTC 12890) and hooded seal (17a-1) strain. Both bacterial strains invaded mononuclear cells and survived intracellularly without any major reduction in bacterial counts for at least 48 hours. Our study shows that the B. pinnipedialis strain isolated from hooded seal survives in Atlantic cod, and suggests that Atlantic cod could play a role in the transmission of B. pinnipedialis to hooded seals in the wild.

Highlights

  • Brucella spp. were isolated from marine mammals in 1994 [1] and published as Brucella pinnipedialis and Brucella ceti in 2007 [2]

  • Brucella pinnipedialis survives in Atlantic cod head kidney derived monocytes/macrophages

  • Integrity was impaired after 48 h (S2 Fig), but no significant differences were found between control cells, and cells infected with the reference (12890) or the hooded seal (17a-1) strain

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brucella spp. were isolated from marine mammals in 1994 [1] and published as Brucella pinnipedialis and Brucella ceti in 2007 [2]. Marine mammal brucellae have been isolated from several pinniped and cetacean species, and B. ceti-associated pathology is well documented in dolphins, reported pathology associated with infection of true seals with B. pinnipedialis is sparse [3]. Hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) of the Northeast Atlantic stock have a high prevalence of Brucella (serology and bacteriology), but pathological changes due to infection with B. pinnipedialis hooded seal (HS) strain have not been observed [4, 5]. Pathology may occur in other mammals following experimental infection with B. pinnipedialis, reports are limited. The only severe pathological outcome has been identified in cattle (Bos taurus), where abortion was induced after infection with a B. pinnipedialis Pacific harbour seal (Phoca vitulina richardsi) strain [11]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call