Abstract

The experimental burn plot (EBP) trial initiated in 1954 is one of few ongoing long-termfire ecology research projects in Africa. The trial aims to assess the impacts of differentfire regimes in the Kruger National Park. Recent studies on the EBPs have raised questions as to the experimental design of the trial, and the appropriate model specificationwhen analysing data. Archival documentation reveals that the original design was modified on several occasions, related to changes in the park's fire policy. These modifications include the addition of extra plots, subdivision of plots and changes in treatmentsover time, and have resulted in a design which is only partially randomised. The representativity of the trial plots has been questioned on account of their relatively small size,the concentration of herbivores on especially the frequently burnt plots, and soil variation between plots. It is suggested that these factors be included as covariates inexplanatory models or that certain plots be excluded from data analysis based on resultsof independent studies of these factors. Suggestions are provided for the specificationof the experimental design when analysing data using Analysis of Variance. It is concluded that there is no practical alternative to treating the trial as a fully randomisedcomplete block design.

Highlights

  • The experimental burn plot trial initiated in 1954 in the Kruger National Park is one of few long-term fire ecology research projects in Africa

  • The ensuing analysis of data has raised questions about the experimental design of the trial and how the design should be specified in Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

  • This paper outlines the history of the experimental burn plot (EBP) trial and describes the current experimental design

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The experimental burn plot trial initiated in 1954 in the Kruger National Park is one of few long-term fire ecology research projects in Africa. Following detailed vegetation surveys conducted during the early 1970s, it was concluded that the February treatments did not differ significantly from the fire exclosure (National Parks Board 1976).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.