Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate whether different types of experimental and commercial restorative dental materials can protect dentin against acid-induced softening. Experimental composites were prepared with a photocurable mixture of methacrylates and two types of bioactive glass (45S5 and a customized low-Na F-containing formulation). Human dentin samples were prepared from mid-coronal tooth slices and immersed in lactic acid solution (pH = 4.0) at 5 mm from set specimens of restorative material. After 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, and 32 days, surface microhardness of dentin samples and pH of the immersion solution were measured, followed by replenishing of the immersion medium. Microstructural analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy. The protective effect of restorative materials was determined as dentin microhardness remaining statistically similar to initial values for a certain number of acid additions. Scanning electron microscopy showed a gradual widening of dentinal tubules and proved less discriminatory than microhardness measurements. To produce a protective effect on dentin, 20 wt% of low-Na F-containing bioactive glass was needed, whereas 10 wt% of bioactive glass 45S5 was sufficient to protect dentin against acid-induced demineralization. The anti-demineralizing protective effect of experimental and commercial restoratives on dentin was of shorter duration than measured for enamel in a previous study using the same experimental approach.

Highlights

  • Composite materials based on methacrylate resins and glass fillers are used for a wide variety of dental applications [1]

  • As MH values significantly decreased over time in acid immersion, the protective effect of restorative materials was determined as MH remaining statistically similar to initial values for a certain number of acid additions

  • As well as for E-10, Beautifil II, and ChemFil, dentin MH was significantly different from the baseline values already at the first measurement point (4 days)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Composite materials based on methacrylate resins and glass fillers are used for a wide variety of dental applications [1]. After the material is applied into the tooth cavity and its setting is triggered using blue light, the polymerization reaction leads to the shortening of intermolecular distances, reducing the macroscopic material volume and resulting in localized discontinuities between the restoration and tooth cavity margin [3]. These marginal flaws are readily populated by cariogenic bacteria, facilitating their growth by providing protection from regular tooth cleansing. The accumulated bacteria create an acidic environment conducive for the formation of recurrent (secondary)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call