Experimental axial-compressive behaviour of bare cold-formed-steel studs with semirigid-track and ideal-hinged boundary-conditions

Abstract

Studs are the primary load-bearing components in cold-formed steel (CFS) wall panels, connected to tracks at both ends with self-tapping screws, forming a semirigid boundary condition (BCT). Most existing tests on the axial compressive behaviour of bare CFS studs are based on either theoretically-hinged (BCH) or fully-fixed boundary conditions. Previous researchers have employed BCT only on sheathed stud-wall panels. However, practicing engineers and current design codes, e.g., Eurocode 3, follow an all-steel design. Therefore, this research experimentally investigated bare-CFS-studs' axial compressive behaviour with BCT, considering, for the first time, the combined effect of the tracks' warping rigidity, stud-to-track gap, non-linear connection stiffness, and bare studs' various cross-sectional slenderness. Forty-two industry-standard lipped channel sections (studs) of five thicknesses (1.2-3 mm), three depths (75–125 mm), and two heights (1.2 & 1.5 m) were tested under static-concentric axial compressive loading with BCT. Another fourteen studs were tested with BCH, a comparator to BCT. Results demonstrated that the studs' global failure mechanisms were flexural-torsional in BCT instead of flexural in BCH. Studs' axial stiffness was two-phased in BCT due to the stud-to-track gap, compared to single-phased stiffness in BCH. >1.8 mm stud-to-track gap caused stud-to-track connections' failure and studs' sudden capacity reduction during gap closure. Studs achieved 1.22 times higher axial-compressive strength, 2.3 times more axial-shortening, 0.7 times lower axial stiffness, and 58% lower axial-compressive strain at the web-midheight under BCT-PhaseII than BCH. Tested strengths were compared with EC3 design strength, and an effective-length-factor of 0.65 was suggested for efficient design of studs with BCT.