Abstract
In this paper, we provide a comparison between two indirect experimental methodologies to assess ductile damage in P91 steel tested at 1100℃: the micro-tomography and the ultrasonic wave propagation techniques. To understand the effect of the strain rate on damage or porosity evolution, two series of tensile tests were carried out: a first (quasi-static) one featuring a velocity of the testing machine track of 0.06 mm/s and a second (high strain rate) one featuring a track velocity of 50 mm/s. Each set consisted of tests conducted up to increasing values of the maximum track displacement, so as to provide pictures of damage distribution at increasing severity. A simplified micromechanical analysis is developed for data elaboration of the ultrasonic measurements. We show that the estimates of overall damage, provided by the two experimental techniques for the necked region of the specimens, agree fairly well in most of the cases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.