Abstract

Several noteworthy accidents clearly pointed out the risk of disproportioned collapse of framed structures. Design codes recently recognized it by adding a new requirement: the structural robustness. Among the different approaches to check robustness, the most popular is associated with the column loss scenario: the analysis should verify that, in case of a column loss, an alternative load path does exist, limiting the portion of structure affected by collapse. Consequently, numerous experimental and numerical studies of 2D and 3D structures were carried out in recent years to identify the mechanism of load transfer from the damaged to the undamaged part of the structure. This knowledge becomes an essential and fundamental key for assuring adequate resistance against progressive collapse by the development of catenary action in the beams and membrane action in the floor slab. Studies of reinforced concrete systems and of bare steel sub-assemblies are numerous. More recent is the focus on the response of steel–concrete composite structures subjected to accidental events. Furthermore, most of these studies focused on the characterization of 2D sub-assemblies or 3D in-scale framed structures. This paper presents an experimental assessment of the structural response of a 3D full-scale steel and concrete composite frame under the column loss scenario. The results are finally compared with the response of a frame with the same overall geometry but different columns’ layout, tested by the Authors within the same research programme.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call