Abstract

This paper studies the statistical correlation in mechanical characteristics of class F fly ash based geopolymer concrete (CFGPC). Experimentally measured values of the compressive strength, elastic modulus and indirect tensile strength of CFGPC specimens made from class F fly ash (CFA) were presented and analyzed. The results were compared with those of corresponding ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) using statistical hypothesis tests. Results illustrated that when possessing similar compressive and tensile strength, the elastic modulus for CFGPC is significantly lower than that of OPCC. The corresponding expressions recommended by standards for the case of OPCC is proved to be inaccurate when applied in the case of CFGPC. Statistical regression was used to identify tendencies and correlations within the mechanical characteristics of CFGPC, as well as the empirical equations for predicting tensile strength and elastic modulus of CFGPC from its compressive strength values. In conclusion, CFGPC and OPCC has significant differences in terms of the correlations between mechanical properties. The empirical equations obtained in this study could provide relatively accurate predictions on the mechanical behavior of CFGPC.

Highlights

  • Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is the most widely used concrete binder

  • Despite the special high compressive compressive strength achieved from CFA2, the class F fly ash based geopolymer concrete (CFGPC) samples manufactured from all the three batches of fly ash in this study showed similar correlations between compressive strength and tensile strength achieved from CFA2, the CFGPC samples manufactured from all the three batches of fly ash in this study showed similar correlations between compressive strength and tensile strength/elastic modulus

  • This study mainly presents the investigation into three essential mechanical characteristics of fly ash based geopolymer concrete (CFGPC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is the most widely used concrete binder. OPC, aggregates and water together form ordinary Portland cement concrete (OPCC) that dominates the market of construction materials [1]. According to the USGS Mineral Program Cement Report [2], the world. OPC production was over 3800 million tons in 2018. The tremendous amount of OPC use is of great concern given that the production of OPC results in serious greenhouse gas emissions. It has been speculated that carbon dioxide (CO2 ) released from fossil fuel combustion in cement manufacture could be the primary anthropogenic driver of climate change [3]. The durability problems caused by OPC [4,5] are of great concern in terms of directly damaging the safety of structures [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call