Abstract
The resisting mechanism of precast concrete (PC) structures against progressive collapse varies from different types of beam-column connection details. In this context, the progressive collapse resistances and the corresponding resisting capacity models for the widely adopted PC structures with additional connecting rebars is significant when extreme events frequently occurred from time to time. In this study, progressive collapse resistance of one emulative PC beam-column subassembly and two PC specimens with connecting rebars were experimentally and analytically investigated. It is found that flexural action, compressive arch action (CAA) and tensile catenary action (TCA) were sequentially developed. Compared with the emulative specimen, the specimens with connecting rebars exhibited higher CAA and TCA capacities and dissimilar failure modes by dispersing the concentrated deformations at the beam ends to other locations. To elucidate such differences, a modified CAA model considering the real stress state of reinforcements and a TCA model accounting for the tensile steel force’s direction and the difference in failure mode were proposed. Experimental validation shows that the proposed models is effective to predict the CAA and TCA capacities with good accuracy. The findings in this study are beneficial to the understanding and formulation of the progressive collapse resistance of PC structures for practical engineering design.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.