Experimental Amebiasis: A Selected Review of Some In Vivo Models

Abstract

The use of in vivo animal models in amebiasis has contributed significantly to the knowledge of this common human parasitic disease. Although there is no animal model that mimics the whole cycle of the human disease, the use of different susceptible and resistant laboratory animals and the availability for many years of techniques for the axenic culture of trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica have allowed a better understanding of the parasite and the host-parasite relationship. The recent introduction of frontier methodologies in biology has increased our comprehension of this parasite. New information on the cellular and molecular biology and genetics of this organism has been extensively reported, and much of this has clearly required the more frequent use of animal models to verify specific facts. Based on experimental animals characterized previously, the introduction of new animal models with genetic or surgical modifications, especially in mice, has allowed a more adequate analysis of the mechanisms of pathogenesis. Multiple factors have been considered in the promotion of the invasiveness and virulence of E. histolytica. Additionally, the immunological and physiological responses of the host, depending on the environmental conditions, lead to the establishment or the rejection of the parasite. The role of inflammatory reaction to amebic infection constitutes one of the controversies that has been studied by several authors. In susceptible animals (hamsters and gerbils), inflammatory cell damage seems to be related to target cell lysis, while in resistant animals (mice), inflammatory cells appear to protect the host by lysing the parasite. Presently, the involvement of various substances in the development of lesions including lectins, proteases, amebapores, promoters of apoptosis, cytokines, nitric oxide, etc., is being examined using different in vivo models.