Abstract

Soil-abutment or soil-pile interactions under cyclic static loads have been widely studied in integral abutment jointless bridges (IAJBs). However, the IAJB has the combinational interaction of soil-abutment and soil-pile, and the soil-abutment-pile interaction is lack of comprehensively study. Therefore, a reciprocating low-cycle pseudo-static test was carried out under an cyclic horizontal displacement load (DL) to gain insight into the mechanical behavior of the soil-abutment-pile system. Test results indicate that the earth pressure of backfill behind abutment has the ratcheting effect, which induced a large earth pressure. The soil-abutment-pile system has a favorable energy dissipation capacity and seismic behavior with relatively large equivalent viscous damping. The accumulative horizontal deformation in pile will be occurred by the effect of abutment and unbalance soil pressure of backfill. The test shows that the maximum horizontal deformation of pile occurs in the pile depth of 1.0b~3.0b of pile body rather than at the pile head due to the accumulative deformation of pile, which is significantly different from those of previous test results of soil-pile interaction. The time-history curve for abutment is relatively symmetrical and its accumulative deformation is small. However, the time-history curve of pile is asymmetrical and its accumulative deformation is dramatically large. The traditional theory of deformation applies only to the calculation of noncumulative deformation of pile, and the influence of accumulative deformation should be considered in practical engineering. A significant difference of inclinations in the positive and negative directions increases when the displacement load is relatively large. The rotation of abutment when bridge expands is larger than that when bridge contracts due to earth pressure of backfill.

Highlights

  • Jointless bridge has a continuous superstructure without moveable deck joint (MDJ), which includes integral abutment jointless bridge (IAJB), semi-integral abutment jointless bridge (SAJB) and deck-extension abutment jointless bridge (DAJB), etc

  • The results indicate that the piles supporting on the abutment in IAJB should have reasonable flexibility to accommodate the horizontal movement

  • The researchers indicate that the earth pressure behind the abutment in IAJBs increases gradually with the periodical and seasonal temperature over the years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Jointless bridge has a continuous superstructure without moveable deck joint (MDJ), which includes integral abutment jointless bridge (IAJB), semi-integral abutment jointless bridge (SAJB) and deck-extension abutment jointless bridge (DAJB), etc. The superstructure would be moved (expansion/contraction) along the longitudinal direction of bridge under temperature variations, creep and shrinkage effects, or earthquake excitations [6] These movements would inevitably cause the abutment and pile foundation to move back and forth and induce soil-structures interaction (including soil-pile, soil-abutment, abutment-pile, and soil-abutment-pile). For the researches of soil-abutment interaction, some researchers carried out the tests in Lab or in filed to study the effects of temperature or seismic movements on IAJBs. Huang et al [11] and Chen et al [12] reported that when abutment moved towards the embankment, the earth pressure was equal to about two-thirds of the Rankine passive earth pressure after several cycles. The researchers indicate that the earth pressure behind the abutment in IAJBs increases gradually with the periodical and seasonal temperature over the years This phenomenon of increasing earth pressure is called the ratcheting effect of soil [20]. Horizontal deformation of the specimen along the depth direction, the time-history curve with or without considering the accumulative deformation and accumulative angle were studied in this paper

Design and Manufacturing
Specimen Material and Soil Properties
Specimen Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Soil Box Design and Manufacturing
Specimen
Layout
D10 Front of abutment
Loading Scheme
Relationship between Earth Pressure and Displacement Load
Distribution of Earth Pressure
Hysteretic
14. Illustration
Skeleton Curve
Time‐History
Horizontal Deformation along the Depth
Rotation
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call