Abstract
BackgroundGuidelines recommend screening for atrial fibrillation (AF). Currently, screening is not considered standard care among GPs.AimTo explore the experiences of primary care workers with different methods of screening for AF and with implementation in daily practice.Design & settingA qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs, nurses, and healthcare assistants (HCAs) who were experienced with implementing different methods of screening.MethodTwo independent researchers audio-recorded and analysed interviews using a thematic approach. They asked participants about their experiences with the different methods used for screening AF and which obstacles they faced when implementing screening in daily practice.ResultsIn total 15 GPs, nurse practitioners, and HCAs from seven different practices were interviewed. The GP’s office is suited for screening for AF, which ideally should be integrated with standard care. Participants considered pulse palpation, automated sphygmomanometer with AF detection, and single-lead electrocardiography (ECG) as practical tests. Participants trusted pulse palpation over the algorithm of the devices. The follow-up of a positive test with a time-consuming 12-lead ECG hindered integration of screening. The single-lead ECG device reduced the need for immediate follow-up because it can record a rhythm strip. The extra workload of screening and lack of financial coverage form obstacles for implementation.ConclusionPulse palpation, automated blood pressure measure monitors with AF detection, and single-lead ECGs might facilitate screening in a general practice setting. When implementing screening, focus should be on how to avoid disruption of consultation hours by unplanned 12-lead ECGs.
Highlights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia
Two independent researchers audio recorded and analysed interviews using a thematic approach. They asked participants about their experiences with the different methods used for screening AF and which obstacles they faced with implementing screening in daily practice
The general practitioners (GPs)’s office is suited for screening for AF, which ideally should be integrated with standard care
Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia. Prevalence increases strongly with age. The European Society of Cardiology recommends screening for AF in their most recent guideline.[3] To facilitate detection of AF, new methods have been developed, such as electronic blood pressure monitors with an AF detection function, handheld ECG devices that can record a rhythm strip, and wearable devices. These methods have the potential to facilitate GPs with the identification of silent AF. What hurdles do they experience? What possible factors - such as time, usability, necessary skills - do they consider important when they consider different screening methods?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
