Abstract
IntroductionNovel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This work aimed to compare image quality and radiation dose of CBCT and MDCT.Materials and methodsFifty-four CBCT-MDCT examination pairs, containing nine MDCTs acquired in parallel prospectively and 45 MDCTs matched in retrospect, were included in this study. Image quality was analyzed semi-objectively by measuring noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and subjectively by performing image impression ratings. CT dose records were readout.ResultsImage noise was significantly lower in CBCT compared with MDCT, both semi-objectively and subjectively (both p < 0.001). CNR and SNRs were also in favor of CBCT, though CBCT examinations exhibited significantly more beam hardening artifacts that diminished the advantages of the superior semi-objective image quality. These artifacts were believed to occur more often in children due to numerous bone-cartilage transitions in open growth plates and may have led to a better subjective diagnostic certainty rating (p = 0.001). Motion artifacts were infrequently, but exclusively observed in CBCT. CT dose index (CTDIvol) was substantially lower in CBCT (p < 0.001).ConclusionDedicated extremity CBCT could be an alternative low-dose modality in the diagnostic pathway of pediatric fractures. At lower doses compared with MDCT and commonly affected by beam hardening artifacts, semi-objective CBCT image quality parameters were generally better than in MDCT.
Highlights
Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)
Some manufacturers introduced dedicated extremity CBCT scanners [3,4,5,6]. Their novelty involves an element of uncertainty concerning the advantages and drawbacks of these new devices, underlining the necessity to obtain more related scientific data in comparison with commonly performed multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)
Pediatric extremity CBCT offers possible dose savings that are of concern due to a higher radiation sensitivity of children [9]
Summary
Novel dedicated extremity cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices, recently introduced to the market, raised attention as a possible alternative in advanced diagnostic pediatric trauma imaging, today usually performed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Some manufacturers introduced dedicated extremity CBCT scanners [3,4,5,6] Their novelty involves an element of uncertainty concerning the advantages and drawbacks of these new devices, underlining the necessity to obtain more related scientific data in comparison with commonly performed multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). Initial studies and experiences with extremity CBCT machines in adults and children consistently demonstrated excellent image quality and diagnostic accuracy at comparable levels to commonly used MDCT scanners [3, 4, 10,11,12]. MDCT-related literature provided similar results of occult fractures that only became evident on further or follow-up imaging [16]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
