Abstract
AbstractBackgroundInternationally, many children and adults with intellectual disabilities are continually being supported by their family members to live within their family home. However, as a consequence of the ageing process some family members can struggle to continue to care because of their failing physical and/or mental ill‐health. This has resulted in a shift in the parameters of the relationship for some adults with intellectual disabilities with their formerly dependent role evolving into a caregiving one. This had become known as “reciprocity” or “mutual support.” Limited information exists about these “hidden carers” and what services are available to support them.AimThis article explored the lived experiences of nine adults with intellectual disabilities who provided emotional and tangible support to an ageing family member.MethodA qualitative methodology was employed using semi‐structured interviews. Nine participants with mild‐to‐moderate intellectual disabilities were interviewed within one region of the United Kingdom. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.FindingsFive themes emerged within these narrative accounts: natural transition to caring; the health needs of the ageing family member; support; impact of caregiving and future planning.DiscussionThe needs of these unknown hidden carers, and also ageing family members, are immediate and urgent. Policy makers, commissioners and service providers need to examine the type of “in‐house” support provided to these new carers if they are to continue living within their family home with their ageing family member, who will also need additional support. Neglecting both cohorts will lead to greater costs to services in the longer term and seriously threaten the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities and their family carers.
Highlights
People with intellectual disabilities are living longer than ever before
Reciprocal caring is a natural result of more people with intellectual disabilities surviving into older age and living with ageing family members
Reciprocal caring may be a short-term issue, for example, if the ageing family member becomes ill, but for many, as in this study, it reflects the increasing frailty of the family member and is permanent and likely to become more onerous for the person with the intellectual disability and other family members
Summary
People with intellectual disabilities are living longer than ever before. As a result, an increasing number of older people with intellectual disabilities are living at home with ageing and increasingly frail family caregivers; a growing number of whom are 65 years of age and above, of whom are ageing in tandem with their adult offspring (Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities, 2018; Taggart, Truesdale-Kennedy, Ryan, & McConkey, 2012; Emerson & Hatton, 2008; Foundation for People with Learning Disabilities, 2006). As a consequence of the ageing process some family members can struggle to continue to care because of their failing physical and/or mental ill-health This has resulted in a shift in the parameters of the relationship for some adults with intellectual disabilities with their formerly dependent role evolving into a caregiving one. Commissioners and service providers need to examine the type of “in-house” support provided to these new carers if they are to continue living within their family home with their ageing family member, who will need additional support Neglecting both cohorts will lead to greater costs to services in the longer term and seriously threaten the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities and their family carers
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.