Abstract

Using reaction-time measures, research on the relationship between childhood maltreatment and biased attention to emotional stimuli in adults has obtained inconsistent results. To help clarify this issue, we conducted an eye-tracking study on the link between childhood maltreatment and allocation of attention to facial emotions analyzing gaze behavior in addition to manual reactions. In contrast to prior investigations, we excluded individuals with tendencies to minimize maltreatment experiences from analyses. Gaze behavior and manual response time of 58 healthy women were examined in a dot-probe task in which pairs of emotional (happy, sad, or disgusted) and neutral faces were presented. In our analyses, participants’ affectivity, level of alexithymia, and intelligence were controlled. Entry time and dwell time on facial expressions were used as indicators of attention allocation. Childhood maltreatment showed no effect on response latencies but was associated with shorter entry times on emotional faces and shorter dwell time on disgusted faces. Experiences of childhood maltreatment seem to be linked to an increased early vigilance to emotional social signals and to an attentional avoidance of hostile facial expressions at a later stage of perception. The present results suggest a vigilance-avoidance pattern of attention allocation associated with childhood maltreatment.

Highlights

  • Using reaction-time measures, research on the relationship between childhood maltreatment and biased attention to emotional stimuli in adults has obtained inconsistent results

  • Indirect measures of attention biases based on response latencies appear to have methodological weaknesses which might be overcome with more direct measures of attention such as the examination of participants’ gaze behavior during the dot-probe task

  • In the present eye-tracking study, we examined the association of childhood maltreatment with allocation of attention to facial emotions in a dot-probe task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Using reaction-time measures, research on the relationship between childhood maltreatment and biased attention to emotional stimuli in adults has obtained inconsistent results. To help clarify this issue, we conducted an eye-tracking study on the link between childhood maltreatment and allocation of attention to facial emotions analyzing gaze behavior in addition to manual reactions. Using the dot-probe paradigm, research on the relationship between childhood maltreatment and biased attention to emotional stimuli has obtained contradicting results. Further studies found no evidence for relations of childhood maltreatment with attentional biases either toward or away from threatening or negative c­ ues[17,18] These mixed findings could be due to the poor psychometric properties of the dot-probe task. Indirect measures of attention biases based on response latencies appear to have methodological weaknesses which might be overcome with more direct measures of attention such as the examination of participants’ gaze behavior during the dot-probe task

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call