Abstract

While histories of law tend to examine the lawyers and judges involved through readings of the texts of transcripts and judgments, this contribution contextualises and presents a different and rarer artefact: the recollections of a client seeking to become part of a divisive, nationally significant case. The text here is a transcript that combines two interviews I conducted with Dr Bob Brown about his experience as head of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society when it sought to appear as amicus curiae before the High Court in the Tasmanian Dam Case. As an historical artefact, this interview tells a story of coming to law: Brown's recollections and explanation of the Wilderness Society's aims, expectations and experience before, during and after the matter. This contribution contextualises and presents the interview. To conclude, it suggests that among many readings of this text, it can be usefully read as a story about legalism; here, the encounter and disjuncture between environmental values and legal form.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.