Experiences and views of midwives performing antenatal cardiotocography in Dutch primary care: A qualitative study

Abstract

ObjectiveIn the current Dutch maternity care system, pregnant women who have an indication for an antenatal cardiotocography (CTG) to be undertaken need to be referred from primary midwife-led care to secondary obstetric-led care. Within three different regions in the Netherlands independent primary care midwives perform antenatal CTG in primary care, introduced as a pilot project. The aim of this study was to evaluate the experiences and views of primary care midwives who perform antenatal CTG in primary care. DesignUsing a qualitative approach data were collected by seventeen in depth semi-structured interviews. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic coding. SettingThree regions in the Netherlands where midwives carry out antenatal CTG in primary care during this pilot project. ParticipantsSeventeen primary care midwives were interviewed between July and November 2017. FindingsIn general, midwives were satisfied with performing antenatal CTG and felt it contributed positively towards the midwife-client relationship. However, midwives experienced an increased workload, partly due to time-consuming technical difficulties. Furthermore, mixed feelings existed on whether antenatal CTG contributes to a more physiological or to a more pathological approach in midwifery practice. Most midwives believed that performing antenatal CTG contributes to the physiological process: strengthening of their gate-keeper role, increased confidence of their clients and improved midwife-client relationship. In contrast, some midwives believed it contributes to a pathological process: medicalization and relying too much on technical devices. Key conclusionsThis study showed an overall positive attitude of primary care midwives towards performing antenatal CTG when required, in primary midwife-led care. However, performing the antenatal CTG can be a challenge for midwives, as midwifery care within this setting is often for healthy women who have a straightforward pregnancy. For some midwives, providing antenatal CTG monitoring in the primary care setting may be seen as using a pathological approach to midwifery care. Implications for practiceThere seems to be a place for antenatal CTG in primary midwife-led care. However, further research is needed before this practice can be implemented widely.