Abstract

A penalty function approach has been used to find a feasible point for a non-linear optimization problem of up to 90 variables and over 400 constraints which arises during a computer method of road design. An assessment has been made of some unconstrained and constrained direct search methods and also of sum-of-squares methods for minimizing this penalty function. Of the unconstrained direct search methods, alternating-variable search was found to perform much better than either Powell's (1964) method or Nelder and Mead's ‘simplex’ method. Rosenbrock's method required too much storage. A constrained version of the alternating-variable search method did not perform as well as the unconstrained version and sum-of-squares minimization algorithms were too large to implement. In this case, of a large non-linear problem, techniques based on advanced mathematical concepts of well-behaved functions appear much less appropriate than the simple direct search method which makes no assumptions about the function.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call