Abstract

Relevance: Surgical intervention is the most revolutionary method in the complex specific therapy of malignant neoplasms. Oncosurgical operations are among the most traumatic; the volume of surgical intervention depends on the stage of the tumor process and its
 prevalence, the presence of metastases, germination in neighboring tissues and organs, and concomitant diseases. Particular importance
 is attached to the anesthetic management of the perioperative period.
 Regional anesthesia is practically not used for several reasons in oncosurgical reconstructive and plastic interventions on the abdominal organs. First, the anesthetist’s qualification plays a role in choosing the anesthesia method, especially when performing high epidural
 anesthesia, which is technically challenging. The emergence of highly effective anesthetics and high-quality sets for epidural anesthesia
 has significantly expanded the scope of this type of anesthesia in oncosurgery.
 This study aimed to demonstrate the possibilities and advantages of epidural anesthesia in the perioperative period using the described
 clinical case as an example.
 Methods: Patient N. was admitted to the clinic for surgical treatment for a malignant neoplasm of the transverse colon without clinical
 signs of obstruction of the lumen of the large intestine. She underwent laparotomy, subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, resection of the
 omentum, and lymph node dissection. Epidural anesthesia with catheterization of the epidural space and administration of ropivacaine and
 morphine was used as an anesthetic aid.
 Results: Adequate pain relief, relaxation, the absence of clinically significant autonomic reactions in the intraoperative period, and
 adequate pain relief without narcotic analgesics in the postoperative period were achieved. The patient was activated on days 3-5 after
 surgery. Subjectively, the patient emphasized the comfortable course of the perioperative period.
 Conclusion: Thus, our experience of using regional (epidural) anesthesia in oncosurgery as an isolated method of anesthesia, subject
 to technically competent and accurate execution of the procedure, allows us to recommend it as a reasonable alternative or a component
 of generally accepted traditional general anesthesia to reduce the risk of anesthesia, adequate and effective anesthesia in the perioperative
 period and optimization of economic and logistical costs in the postoperative period.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.