Abstract

Many animals can recognize chemical cues of predators and show defensive responses, but antipredatory behavior can be costly and should be modulated depending on the level of risk posed by each predatory species. Recognition ability may be innate, but it is not clear whether there might also be local adaptation to predation pressure levels or some learning component. We examined the chemosensory ability of naive and adult Iberian wall lizards, Podarcis hispanicus, to detect chemical cues of two closely related Coronella snake species in two localities within the same continuous population. Lizards in each locality are sympatric with only one of the two snake species. Our results showed an innate chemosensory discrimination of predatory snake cues, as both adult lizards and captive reared naive hatchlings, which had not had any previous experience with the snake cues, had short latencies to the first tongue-flick, increased tongue-flick responses, and active escape behavior from the scent of either of the two snake species. Moreover, adult lizards, but not naive hatchlings, showed differential responses to the two different snake species, with higher responses to the snake species that is sympatric in each locality. This strongly suggests that there is a learning component acquired through previous lifetime experiences that may increase accuracy of the discrimination of the sympatric snake. Therefore, through learning of local conditions, lizards may modulate their innate antipredatory responses to the risk level posed by each snake species.

Highlights

  • Detection and recognition of predators before an attack occurs is an essential task for prey animals (Lima and Dill 1990)

  • We examined the ability of naïve and adult Iberian wall lizards, P. hispanicus, from two localities within the same population to detect chemical cues of two closely related Coronella snake species

  • Pairwise comparisons showed that latency times to water were significantly longer than to either of the two snake stimuli (Tukey’s tests, P=0.00012 in both cases), but latency times did not differ between the two snake species (P=0.99)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Detection and recognition of predators before an attack occurs is an essential task for prey animals (Lima and Dill 1990). Recognition of the predator or its cues allows prey to modify their behavior to avoid risky encounters with the predator. Prey animals should ideally be able to accurately identify predators, assess the level of risk that each particular predator poses, and adjust the intensity of their antipredatory behavior . After identification, prey should consider the predator’s relative threat and the overall predation pressure in a population. This may require previous experiences with each particular type of predator

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call