Expenditures of The German Statutory Health Insurance for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention 2012-2017: Positive Effects Due To The Disease Prevention Law?

Abstract

The German Prevention Act aims to strengthen health promotion and disease prevention. The law makes changes to the so-called "§20 measures". Target values were newly given for the expenditures of the health insurance funds in this area. The objective here was to examine how the prevention expenditures of the statutory health insurance developed in the period from 2012 to 2017, and whether the requirements of the Prevention Act were met. The accounting results of the statutory health insurance funds were evaluated for the period 2012-2017. The expenditures per insured person were calculated and the changes in expenditures were analysed. The effect of the prevention law was highlighted by differentiation of the time periods 2012-2014 and 2014-2017. In 2017, about 2.5% of the total expenditure of the German statutory health insurance, around 5 billion euros, was accounted for in the reported prevention areas. Nearly 60% of these prevention expenditures were on early detection and vaccinations. Expenditure on "§20 measures" amounted to € 7.17 per insured person and thus reached the statutory guideline but accounted for less than 10% of all prevention expenditure. Although prevention expenditure per insured person increased over the period, the proportion of money spent on prevention measures as a whole had decreased since 2015. Expenditure on prevention measures that were directly aimed at the insured (individual approach, bonus programmes) and the setting approach (non-occupational settings, worksite health promotion) had hardly increased overall since the Prevention Act came into force. This effect is due to the equally strong decrease in bonuses for health-conscious behaviour among insured persons, despite the sharp increase in expenditure on company and noncompany settings. The proportion of money spent on disease prevention in total expenditure is still decreasing. The targets set by the Prevention Act, however, have been reached. Thus, target values have apparently proved to be an effective instrument for regulating prevention expenditure and have led to an increase in expenditure in the setting approach. Overall, there has been no expenditure effect in the area of disease prevention since the Prevention Act was enacted, as compensation was made at the expense of the non-setting measures without target values.