Expecting the exceptional in the everyday: Policing global transportation hubs

Martin Nøkleberg

doi:10.1177/09670106211007066

Abstract

There has been considerable scholarly interest regarding the notion of exceptionality, i.e. how and under what conditions extraordinary powers and measures are justified in the name of security. Exceptional threats are now omnipresent in the security discourse of the aviation and maritime industries, and this influences the everyday working environment. Taking Norwegian airport and port security as its point of departure, this article analyzes how security and policing agencies perceive, experience, and respond to the exceptional as part of their everyday practice. Drawing on extensive interview material with security agencies, it reveals how agencies construct strategies to cope with the consequences of exceptionality that arise from heightened (in)security and vulnerability. This article demonstrates that instrumental logic in risk management is one crucial strategy, but evidence also reveals the importance of the human dimension in security practices, as the emotional aspect of security consciousness is a part of the everyday life of security agencies. Closely associated with this is the emergence of mechanisms of active resistance that provide excitement and alleviate boredom.

Highlights

In recent decades, it has become fashionable in the security and policing literature to examine security projects to assess how measures are implemented and justified in the name of security
Building upon the literature at the intersection of the exceptional and the everyday, the article suggests that ‘everyday security consciousness’ can help unpack how agencies construct strategies to cope with the consequences of exceptionality and reduce the level of uncertainty
The instrumental logic ofsecurity is prominent in Norwegian airports and ports, agencies recognize that more is needed than risk analyses and tangible and measurable procedures to cope with embodied uncertainty

Summary

Introduction

It has become fashionable in the security and policing literature to examine security projects to assess how measures are implemented and justified in the name of security. There is some understanding of how agencies respond to feelings of meaninglessness (e.g. with frustration or risk management), but how they cope with the consequences of exceptionality in their everyday working life is still underdeveloped, both empirically and conceptually.

Results

Conclusion