Abstract

Attention to undergraduate research (UGR) is not surprising given its widespread appeal and evidence of educational benefit. Tracking participation and identifying equity gaps in UGR are important markers of access to and equity in educationally beneficial experiences. Information about students’ exposure to elements of quality in UGR and how this corresponds to faculty perspectives and instructional practice can help inform efforts to advance and improve UGR. In this article, we use 7 years of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) to explore the national landscape of UGR by examining the responses of 972,088 1st-year students who reported that they planned to participate in UGR before they graduated and the responses of 1,248,854 senior students who reported that they had done or were currently involved in a UGR experience. To complement our student perspectives, we present perspectives on faculty importance of and instructional practice in UGR with data from NSSE’s companion survey, the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement, by examining the experiences of 106,000 faculty respondents. Our presentation of descriptive statistics provides a national overview of UGR participation by a variety of salient institutional and student characteristics, a broad summary of faculty involvement in UGR, and baseline data about students’ exposure to elements of high-impact UGR.

Highlights

  • Over the past three decades, interest in undergraduate research (UGR) has grown

  • Boosted by national organizations and policy groups calling for transformation in undergraduate education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), instructional practices that are more engaging and effective at helping all students learn, and calls to increase diversity in STEM majors, many colleges and universities have enhanced UGR and creative activities (Boyd & Wesemann, 2009; Henderson, Beach, & Finkelstein, 2011; Kinkead, 2003; Weaver, Burgess, Childress, & Slakey, 2016)

  • Participation gaps that exist across IPs, among historically underserved students in higher education (Finley & McNair, 2013; National Survey of Student Engagement NSSE, 2018), reveal that UG is falling short of equity goals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past three decades, interest in undergraduate research (UGR) has grown. Boosted by national organizations and policy groups calling for transformation in undergraduate education in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), instructional practices that are more engaging and effective at helping all students learn, and calls to increase diversity in STEM majors, many colleges and universities have enhanced UGR and creative activities (Boyd & Wesemann, 2009; Henderson, Beach, & Finkelstein, 2011; Kinkead, 2003; Weaver, Burgess, Childress, & Slakey, 2016). Attention to UGR is not surprising given its widespread appeal and evidence of educational benefit Students value exploring their own questions and deepening their research expertise, while faculty appreciate a pedagogical approach that supports the integration of their roles as scholars and teachers and their service as community members. Given changing demographics in undergraduate enrollments and calls for eliminating equity gaps in IPs, it is crucial to acknowledge that UG has long been hailed as important for racially minoriti ed student outcomes (Collins et al, 201 ; Jones, Barlow, & Villarejo, 2010).

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call