Expectant inner-city women: attitudes about contraception given infant feeding choice

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to examine whether low-income inner-city expectant women who intend to breastfeed make different contraceptive choices than those who intend to formula feed. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional pilot study surveyed expectant women age 14 years and older receiving prenatal care at MacDonald Women’s Hospital, Cleveland Ohio (01 November 2016–15 January 2017). Questions assessed knowledge and attitudes regarding infant feeding and contraception options, and postpartum feeding and contraceptive intentions. Results: We enrolled 223 expectant women, mean age 25.6 years at a median of 30 weeks gestation; 192 (86.5%) were African–American and 171 (75%) were multiparous. Women intending to breastfeed had 0.44 times the odds of intending to use birth control after delivery (95% CI [0.19–1.05], p = .06), while women intending to feed formula had 2.26 times the odds of intending to use birth control after delivery (95% CI [0.95–5.40]). Contraceptive attitudes significantly impacted intent to use contraception (p = .007), with every point higher on the contraception attitudes scale equating to a 7% increase in odds of postpartum contraception use. Conclusions: Postpartum contraceptive intentions do not differ significantly between women intending to breastfeed and those intending formula feeding. Contraception attitudes do not significantly change this association, but were significantly related to contraceptive intent. Findings highlight the importance of providing comprehensive birth control education to all expectant mothers, regardless of feeding intention. Our study is unique in addressing interactions between maternal contraceptive and feeding intentions among expectant women at high risk for both not breastfeeding and unintended short interval pregnancy.