Abstract

Currently no single proteomics technology has sufficient analytical power to allow for the detection of an entire proteome of an organelle, cell, or tissue. One approach that can be used to expand proteome coverage is the use of multiple separation technologies especially if there is minimal overlap in the proteins observed by the different methods. Using the inner mitochondrial membrane subproteome as a model proteome, we compared for the first time the ability of three protein separation methods (two-dimensional liquid chromatography using the ProteomeLab PF 2D Protein Fractionation System from Beckman Coulter, one-dimensional reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography, and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis) to determine the relative overlap in protein separation for these technologies. Data from these different methods indicated that a strikingly low number of proteins overlapped with less than 24% of proteins common between any two technologies and only 7% common among all three methods. Utilizing the three technologies allowed the creation of a composite database totaling 348 non-redundant proteins. 82% of these proteins had not been observed previously in proteomics studies of this subproteome, whereas 44% had not been identified in proteomics studies of intact mitochondria. Each protein separation method was found to successfully resolve a unique subset of proteins with the liquid chromatography methods being more suited for the analysis of transmembrane domain proteins and novel protein discovery. We also demonstrated that both the one- and two-dimensional LC allowed for the separation of the alpha-subunit of F1F0 ATP synthase that differed due to a change in pI or hydrophobicity.

Highlights

  • No single proteomics technology has sufficient analytical power to allow for the detection of an entire proteome of an organelle, cell, or tissue

  • Using the inner mitochondrial membrane as a model subproteome, we compared the ability of three protein separation methods (two-dimensional LC (2-DLC1 with the PF2D), one-dimensional reversed phase HPLC (1-DLC; reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC)), and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) to determine the relative overlap in protein separation for these technologies

  • 1-DLC has primarily been used for peptide separation prior to MS, but it can be used for protein separation prior to enzymatic digestion and analysis by MS. 2-DLC traditionally couples a chargebased method as a first dimension with RP-HPLC as the second dimension thereby increasing the extent of protein fractionation compared with 1-DLC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

No single proteomics technology has sufficient analytical power to allow for the detection of an entire proteome of an organelle, cell, or tissue. Using the same well characterized IMM preparation (29 –32) we tested the hypothesis that there would be a minimal overlap of observed proteins when using three different separation technologies (2-DE, 1-DLC, and 2-DLC) thereby expanding proteome coverage. Proteins identified with amino acid sequences obtained from ESI MS/MS had a minimum of two peptide matches (see on-line Supplemental Fig. S1 for representative MS spectra) with a minimum MASCOT score of 40 for each peptide.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call