Abstract

In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, the U.S. Supreme Court established a new constitutional rule. While the exact breadth of the rule remains in doubt, the new jurisprudential principle appears to be as follows—except where such actions would violate the Establishment Clause, the Free Exercise Clause prohibits constitutional actors from conferring or denying benefits solely because of individuals’ or entities’ religious exercises. As discussed in this article, this rule has immediate, long-term ramifications for constitutional jurisprudence, particularly as applied to religious freedom. In light of the potential changes it may engender, the purpose of this three-part article is to provide an overview of Trinity Lutheran and its expansion of rights for student religious groups on the campuses of public college and universities.

Highlights

  • In light of the potential changes it may engender, the purpose of this three-part article is to provide an overview of Trinity Lutheran and its expansion of rights for student religious groups on the campuses of public college and universities

  • While the exact breadth of the rule remains in doubt, the new jurisprudential principle appears to be as follows—except where such actions would violate the Establishment Clause, the Free

  • In an attempt to alleviate costs for replacing much of the playground surface, officials at the Learning Center, who clearly disclosed its status as a ministry of Trinity Lutheran, sought a grant from Missouri’s Scrap Tire Program, operated by the State’s Department of Natural Resources (DNR)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Trinity Lutheran may redefine the intersection of education and religion more than any case since the school prayer decisions of the early 1960s. Trinity Lutheran may signal a return to the original public meaning of the Religion Clauses.. While previous decisions mandated the recognition and general funding of student religious groups in higher education, Trinity Lutheran enhances the rights of student religious organizations at public colleges and universities by ensuring that they are treated the same as other organizations on campus. In light of the potential changes this case may engender, the purpose of this three-part article is to provide an overview of Trinity Lutheran and its expansion of rights for student religious groups on the campuses of public college and universities.

Factual Background
The Missouri State Constitutional Establishment Clause
Lower Court Litigation
Supreme Court Opinions
The Opinion of the Court
Justice Thomas’ Opinion Concurring in the Opinion of the Court
Justice Gorsuch’s Opinion Concurring in the Opinion of the Court
Justice Breyers’ Opinion Concurring in the Judgment Only
Justice Sotomayor’s Dissent
Expanding the Rights of Student Religious Groups
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call