Abstract

Until recently, the field of sex chromosome evolution has been dominated by the canonical unidirectional scenario, first developed by Muller in 1918. This model postulates that sex chromosomes emerge from autosomes by acquiring a sex-determining locus. Recombination reduction then expands outwards from this locus, to maintain its linkage with sexually antagonistic/advantageous alleles, resulting in Y or W degeneration and potentially culminating in their disappearance. Based mostly on empirical vertebrate research, we challenge and expand each conceptual step of this canonical model and present observations by numerous experts in two parts of a theme issue of Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. We suggest that greater theoretical and empirical insights into the events at the origins of sex-determining genes (rewiring of the gonadal differentiation networks), and a better understanding of the evolutionary forces responsible for recombination suppression are required. Among others, crucial questions are: Why do sex chromosome differentiation rates and the evolution of gene dose regulatory mechanisms between male versus female heterogametic systems not follow earlier theory? Why do several lineages not have sex chromosomes? And: What are the consequences of the presence of (differentiated) sex chromosomes for individual fitness, evolvability, hybridization and diversification? We conclude that the classical scenario appears too reductionistic. Instead of being unidirectional, we show that sex chromosome evolution is more complex than previously anticipated and principally forms networks, interconnected to potentially endless outcomes with restarts, deletions and additions of new genomic material.This article is part of the theme issue ‘Challenging the paradigm in sex chromosome evolution: empirical and theoretical insights with a focus on vertebrates (Part II)’.

Highlights

  • Lukáš Kratochvíl1, Matthias Stöck2,3, Michail Rovatsos1, Mónica Bullejos4, Amaury Herpin5,6, Daniel L

  • Crucial questions are: Why do sex chromosome differentiation rates and the evolution of gene dose regulatory mechanisms between male versus female heterogametic systems not follow earlier theory? Why do several lineages not have sex chromosomes? And: What are the consequences of the presence of sex chromosomes for individual fitness, evolvability, hybridization and diversification? We conclude that the classical scenario appears too reductionistic

  • We show that sex chromosome evolution is more complex than previously anticipated and principally forms networks, interconnected to potentially endless outcomes with restarts, deletions and additions of new genomic material

Read more

Summary

The ‘canonical’ scenario of sex chromosome evolution

Sex chromosomes evolved many times independently in eukaryotes and are one of the best examples of convergence at the genomic level. Transposable elements are assumed to have accumulated in the non-recombining regions of sex chromosomes after the cessation of recombination They may contribute to the rise of sex-determining genes during the birth of sex chromosomes and rewiring of gonadal differentiation networks [55]. Intrachromosomal rearrangements such as inversions, preventing recombination in a heterozygous state (always true if linked to the sex-specific allele of the sexdetermining locus), seem much more frequent in some taxa than in others [117,118,119], which may contribute to different rates of sex chromosome differentiation in independently evolved systems. The reasons for the non-random fusion of certain genomic parts to sex chromosomes should be explored in the future, using comparative data

Conclusion
87. Kamiya T et al 2012 A trans-species missense SNP
90. Kuhl H et al 2021 A 180 Myr-old female-specific
95. Torgasheva AA et al 2019 Germline-restricted
96. Malinovskaya LP et al 2020 Germline-restricted
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.