Abstract
The no-evolution, concordance expanding universe cosmology and no-evolution, static universe tired light model are compared against observational data on eight cosmology tests. The no-evolution tired light model is found to make a superior fit on all tests. Any attempts to introduce evolutionary corrections to improve the concordance cosmology fit on one test often worsen its fit on other tests. Light curve data of high redshift gamma ray bursts and quasars fail to support claims for cosmological time dilation due to expansion. Also, the SCP supernova light curve test results are considered to be flawed by selection effect biases. The big bang theory also has difficulty accounting for redshift quantization, for the multi-megaparsec periodicity seen in the distribution of galaxy superclusters, and for the discovery of galaxies at redshifts as high as z ~11.9. In overview, it is concluded that a static universe cosmology must be sought to explain the origin of the universe. One possible choice is a cosmology that predicts nonconservative tired-light redshifting in intergalactic space, the continuous creation of neutrons in space, the rate of matter creation scaling with both celestial body mass and temperature, galaxies growing progressively in size, and changing their morphology in the manner suggested by Jeans and Hubble.
Highlights
One possible choice is a cosmology that predicts nonconservative tired-light redshifting in intergalactic space, the continuous creation of neutrons in space, the rate of matter creation scaling with both celestial body mass and temperature, galaxies growing progressively in size, and changing their morphology in the manner suggested by Jeans and Hubble
It would be necessary to invoke the ad hoc assumption that galaxy radio lobes had larger angular separations in earlier epochs and have been gradually decreasing in size over time. Does this further increase the complexity of the expanding universe cosmology vis-a-vis the tired light cosmology, it requires that one accept that galaxy cluster size and galactic radio lobe separation, which normally would not be expected to be related, both change over time in just the right manner so as to allow the expanding universe model to make a good fit to the data! One might be justified in asking the question about the big bang hypothesis that cosmologist and radio astronomer K
With the emergence of the static universe tired light model in cosmology, subquantum kinetics (SQK) has a matter creation theory ready to explain the origin of the universe in lieu of the big bang explanation; see section
Summary
The no-evolution expanding universe cosmology, on the other hand, is able to fit all the data only if numerous ad hoc assumptions are introduced specifying major evolution in galaxy cluster size, galaxy angular size, galaxy radio lobe size, galaxy luminosity, galaxy surface brightness, and galaxy number density This raises the question as to why cosmologists should stick with the expanding universe hypothesis with its need of ad hoc corrections chosen in such a way as to allow it to fit the various data trends, when the tired light model already fits the data reasonably well on all tests without making such adjustments.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
