Abstract

SummaryBackgroundYellow fever cases are under-reported and the exact distribution of the disease is unknown. An effective vaccine is available but more information is needed about which populations within risk zones should be targeted to implement interventions. Substantial outbreaks of yellow fever in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Brazil, coupled with the global expansion of the range of its main urban vector, Aedes aegypti, suggest that yellow fever has the propensity to spread further internationally. The aim of this study was to estimate the disease's contemporary distribution and potential for spread into new areas to help inform optimal control and prevention strategies.MethodsWe assembled 1155 geographical records of yellow fever virus infection in people from 1970 to 2016. We used a Poisson point process boosted regression tree model that explicitly incorporated environmental and biological explanatory covariates, vaccination coverage, and spatial variability in disease reporting rates to predict the relative risk of apparent yellow fever virus infection at a 5 × 5 km resolution across all risk zones (47 countries across the Americas and Africa). We also used the fitted model to predict the receptivity of areas outside at-risk zones to the introduction or reintroduction of yellow fever transmission. By use of previously published estimates of annual national case numbers, we used the model to map subnational variation in incidence of yellow fever across at-risk countries and to estimate the number of cases averted by vaccination worldwide.FindingsSubstantial international and subnational spatial variation exists in relative risk and incidence of yellow fever as well as varied success of vaccination in reducing incidence in several high-risk regions, including Brazil, Cameroon, and Togo. Areas with the highest predicted average annual case numbers include large parts of Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan, where vaccination coverage in 2016 was estimated to be substantially less than the recommended threshold to prevent outbreaks. Overall, we estimated that vaccination coverage levels achieved by 2016 avert between 94 336 and 118 500 cases of yellow fever annually within risk zones, on the basis of conservative and optimistic vaccination scenarios. The areas outside at-risk regions with predicted high receptivity to yellow fever transmission (eg, parts of Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand) were less extensive than the distribution of the main urban vector, A aegypti, with low receptivity to yellow fever transmission in southern China, where A aegypti is known to occur.InterpretationOur results provide the evidence base for targeting vaccination campaigns within risk zones, as well as emphasising their high effectiveness. Our study highlights areas where public health authorities should be most vigilant for potential spread or importation events.FundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Highlights

  • The global spread of mosquito-borne viruses such as dengue, chikungunya, West Nile virus, and Zika virus during recent decades[1] highlights the urgent need to better understand both contemporary arbovirus distributions and their potential to spread into new areas

  • We used a Poisson point process boosted regression tree model that explicitly incorporated environmental and biological explanatory covariates, vaccination coverage, and spatial variability in disease reporting rates to predict the relative risk of apparent yellow fever virus infection at a 5 × 5 km resolution across all risk zones (47 countries across the Americas and Africa)

  • Implications of all the available evidence Our work furthers understanding of the contemporary global distribution of yellow fever, and the potential for its introduction and establishment into new regions. These results provide a current evidence base to prioritise areas for vaccination and surveillance programmes in present risk zones, and highlight areas where public health authorities should be most vigilant for potential spread or importation events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global spread of mosquito-borne viruses such as dengue, chikungunya, West Nile virus, and Zika virus during recent decades[1] highlights the urgent need to better understand both contemporary arbovirus distributions and their potential to spread into new areas. Substantial outbreaks of yellow fever in Angola, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo), and Brazil in the past 2 years,[2] combined with the global distribution of the main urban vector Aedes aegypti, suggest that yellow fever has the potential to spread further internationally and increase its financial burden on health systems as well as its toll on population health. Local transmission of yellow fever has never been reported in Asia, despite multiple opportunities for introduction and seemingly suitable ecological and climatic conditions.[3]. Multiple transmission cycles of yellow fever virus coexist with different mosquito genera serving as vectors in each cycle. When infected people introduce yellow fever virus into heavily populated areas with competent

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call