Abstract

This paper studies Greek junior high school students’ alternative ideas, both initial and synthetic, on geodynamic phenomena. It comments in detail on students’ concepts on Earth structure, earthquake occurrence, volcano formation, and relief change. Additionally, it attempts to trace and interpret how and why these ideas form (concept development), presenting that initial and synthetic ones are indissolubly attached and utterly directed by environmental interaction. Data analysis verifies that curriculum inadequacy and false scientific terminology in textbooks enforce the generation of alternative ideas. New synthetic alternative ideas on geodynamic phenomena are presented which are mainly characterized by intermittent and fragmentary perspective. Furthermore, the characteristics of both initial and synthetic alternative ideas are outlined, giving emphasis on the facts that students represent geodynamic phenomena as instantaneous events and that they are able to describe the repeatability of the phenomena, but they show difficulty in capturing their continuity. Finally, more factors that control alternative idea development on geodynamic phenomena are highlighted—such as (i) lack of continuous thinking, (ii) distribution, intensity and frequency of geodynamic phenomena, and (iii) current affairs (i.e., pollution, technology evolution, human intervention)—hoping that their revelation will lead to alternative ideas’ decomposition and thus to pure scientific knowledge.

Highlights

  • Earth science literacy is restricted worldwide [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], despite the expanding impact ofEarth processes on humans such as natural hazards, climate change, and geodynamic phenomena

  • We focus on three initial alternative ideas of students, about whether mountains can be formed again in the future or not (Figure 12)

  • We focus on the 34.4% of students, which represents an extensive usage of scientific terminology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earth science literacy is restricted worldwide [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9], despite the expanding impact ofEarth processes on humans such as natural hazards, climate change, and geodynamic phenomena. Emerging student concepts on Earth structure and geodynamic phenomena are on the rise. Students express ideas such as the notion that magma originates from the Earth’s core [15,32,33,34], or that the magma supply for volcanos comes from the inner core [21]. Students claim that earthquakes are triggered by weather and global warming [34] or generally by heat, climate, people, animals, gas pressure, gravity, rotation of the Earth, ‘exploding soil’, or volcanos [20]. It is noteworthy to explore why students consider tectonic plates as static [9,31] and are situated somewhere below the surface [20]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call