Abstract
Abstract In this article, we are concerned about the existence, uniqueness, and nonexistence of the positive solution for: − Δ u − 1 2 ( x ⋅ ∇ u ) = μ h ( x ) u q − 1 + λ u − u p , x ∈ R N , u ( x ) → 0 , as ∣ x ∣ → + ∞ , \left\{\begin{array}{l}-\Delta u-\frac{1}{2}\left(x\cdot \nabla u)=\mu h\left(x){u}^{q-1}+\lambda u-{u}^{p},\hspace{1.0em}x\in {{\mathbb{R}}}^{N},\\ u\left(x)\to 0,\hspace{1em}\hspace{0.1em}\text{as}\hspace{0.1em}\hspace{0.33em}| x| \to +\infty ,\end{array}\right. where N ⩾ 3 N\geqslant 3 , 0 < q < 1 0\lt q\lt 1 , λ > 0 \lambda \gt 0 , p > 1 p\gt 1 , μ > 0 \mu \gt 0 is a parameter and the function h ( x ) h\left(x) satisfies certain conditions. To start with, based on the variational argument and perturbation method, we obtain the existence and uniqueness of the positive solution for the aforementioned singular elliptic differential equation as λ > N 2 \lambda \gt \frac{N}{2} . In addition, there is no solution as λ ⩽ N 2 \lambda \leqslant \frac{N}{2} . Later, from an experimental point of view, we give the numerical solution of the aforementioned singular elliptic differential equation by means of a neural network in some special cases, which enrich the theoretical results. Our conclusions partially extend the results corresponding to the nonsingular case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.