Abstract

We investigate the existence and multiplicity of solutions for second-order Hamiltonian systems satisfying generalized periodic boundary value conditions at resonance by means of the index theory, the critical point theory without compactness assumptions, the least action principle, the saddle point reduction theorem, and the minimax method. Applying the results to second-order HS satisfying periodic boundary value conditions, we obtain some new results.

Highlights

  • Introduction and main resultsSolutions of Hamiltonian systems are very important in applications

  • The existence and multiplicity of solutions for Hamiltonian systems via critical point theory have been studied by many authors

  • By means of critical point theory, the least action principle, and the minimax method, the existence and multiplicity of periodic solutions for second-order Hamiltonian systems with periodic boundary conditions were extensively studied in the cases where the gradient of the nonlinearity is bounded sublinearly and linearly, and many interesting results are given in [5, 9, 10, 13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction and main results

Solutions of Hamiltonian systems are very important in applications. In recent years, the existence and multiplicity of solutions for Hamiltonian systems via critical point theory have been studied by many authors (see [2, 5,6,7,8,9,10, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]). Theorem 1.2 Assume that V (t, x) satisfies (A), (A1), and (A4) there exist f , g ∈ L1([0, 1], R+) with νMs (B1 + f (t)In) = 0 and isM(B1 + f (t)In) = isM(B1) + νMs (B1) such that. Corollary 1.9 Assume that V (t, x) satisfies (A), (A4), and (H5) there exists c0 > 0 large enough such that lim inf |x|–2α. Remark 1.10 As T = 1, in Theorems 1–3 of [14] assume that V (t, x) satisfies (A), (H4), and (A4) there exist α ∈ [0, 1) and f , g ∈ L1([0, 1], R+) such that for all x ∈ Rn and a.e. t ∈ [0, 1]; (H5,1). Corollary 1.12 Assume that V (t, x) satisfies (A), (A4), and (H5) there exists c0 > 0 large enough such that (1.3) or (1.4) hold for x ∈ ker(Λ – (2kπ)2)

Then problem
Similarly to the proof of Proposition
Thus from
It follows that
Noting that

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.