Existe-t-il un bénéfice au dépistage systématique de Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis et Ureaplasma urealyticum dans les prélèvements génito-urinaires réalisés au cours d'un bilan d'infertilité ?

Abstract

We conducted a prospective study on 100 couples consulting for infertility at the teaching Hospital of Tours, with the scope to determine if there is a benefit for systematic screening of Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum among genito-urinary specimen when exploring couples infertility. C. trachomatis was detected by PCR on sperm, endocervix and urine specimen. M. hominis and U. urealyticum were detected by culture on A7 agar medium and with minigaleries on sperm and endocervix specimen. Standard cultures were also performed on sperm, endocervix, vaginal and urine specimen. Only one specimen (sperm) was positive for C. trachomatis. Three percent of the specimen were positive for U. urealyticum (from which 2,5% of the sperm specimen). No specimen was positive for M. hominis. Our results show that screening of C. trachomatis, M. hominis and U. urealyticum is not systematically required for among check up of infertile couples, given the prevalence of chlamydiosis among the population studied. However, it would be interesting to perform it on a targeted population, according to anamnestic or clinical criteria. In addition, an important modification of vaginal flora was observed in 12% of cases, and 2 vaginosis were diagnosed; the putative consequences of this disequilibrium has to be further investigated.