Abstract

In this paper, we propose a comparative study of linear and nonlinear algorithms designed for grid-side control of the power flow in a wind energy conversion system. We performed several simulations and experiments with step and variable power scenarios for different values of the DC-link capacity with the DC storage element being the key element of the grid-side converter. The linear control was designed on the basis of the internal model control theory where an active damping was added to avoid steady state errors. Nonlinear controls were built using first and second order sliding mode controls with theoretical considerations to ensure accuracy and stability. We observed that the first order sliding mode control was the most efficient algorithm for controlling the DC-link voltage but that the chattering degraded the quality of the energy injected into the grid as well as the efficiency of the grid-side converter. The linear control caused overshoots on the DC-link voltage; however, this algorithm had better performance on the grid side due to its smoother control. Finally, the second order sliding mode control did not prove to be more robust than the other two algorithms. This can be explained by the fact that this control is theoretically more sensitive to converter losses.

Highlights

  • Electricity generation from wind energy has developed rapidly in recent years and will continue to grow in the decade [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Since the core of the problem deals with the grid-side converter and the performance between the algorithms presented in Section 3, the generator-side was reduced to a perfect generator

  • For the nonlinear control strategies, the overshoot was much less underlined as the capacity decreased; in the case of SMC1, there was almost no effect observed as the capacity decreased

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electricity generation from wind energy has developed rapidly in recent years and will continue to grow in the decade [1,2,3,4,5,6]. A WECS using a PMSG is generally divided into two parts, the generator-side system and the grid-side system connected to each other by a DC-link capacity. The objective of the generator-side control is to capture the maximum power from wind—whatever its velocity—while the objective of the grid-side control is to control the active and reactive power flow between the WECS and the grid [15,16,17,18]. Both parts of the WCES can be designed separately since they are decoupled by the DC-link capacity

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.