Exergoeconomic and thermodynamic analyses of an externally fired combined cycle with hydrogen production and injection to the combustion chamber

Abstract

A hydrogen production unit is successfully integrated with an externally fired combined cycle using biomass fuel. The hydrogen produced in an electrolyzer can be used for other purposes, but when there is temporarily no market for it is injected into the combustion chamber of an externally fired combined cycle. Injecting hydrogen into the combustion chamber was found to reduce fuel consumption by almost 27%. Moreover, hydrogen injection decreased the energy efficiency and exergy efficiency by 45%, and decreased both the exergy loss and exergy destruction rates. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions decreased by 32%. However, there are some disadvantages to hydrogen injection, especially from the viewpoint of exergoeconomics. The total unit product cost for the externally fired combined cycle with hydrogen injection is almost 27% more than the unit without hydrogen injection, although the exergy loss and destruction costs decreased with hydrogen injection. The value of the relative cost difference with hydrogen injection rises by 40%. Also the exergoeconomic assessment demonstrates that the cost of components (purchase and maintenance) are higher than cost of components' exergy destruction for both cycles, i.e., with and without hydrogen injection. As the compressor pressure ratio increases, optimal points are identified for biomass flow rate, energy and exergy efficiencies, exergy destruction and loss rates, exergy destruction and loss exergy cost rates, total unit product cost and relative cost difference.