Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the diagnostic accuracy, optimal technique, and timing of exercise testing after percutaneous coronary intervention. The objectives of the present study were to analyze variables and the power of exercise testing to predict restenosis or a new lesion, 6 months after the procedure. Eight-four coronary multi-artery diseased patients with preserved ventricular function were studied (66 males, mean age of all patients: 59 +/- 10 years). All underwent coronary angiography and exercise testing with the Bruce protocol, before and 6 months after percutaneous coronary intervention. The following parameters were measured: heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product (heart rate x systolic blood pressure), presence of angina, maximal ST-segment depression, and exercise duration. On average, 2.33 lesions/patient were treated and restenosis or progression of disease occurred in 46 (55%) patients. Significant increases in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.022), rate-pressure product (P = 0.045) and exercise duration (P = 0.003) were detected after the procedure. Twenty-seven (32%) patients presented angina during the exercise test before the procedure and 16 (19%) after the procedure. The exercise test for the detection of restenosis or new lesion presented 61% sensitivity, 63% specificity, 62% accuracy, and 67 and 57% positive and negative predictive values, respectively. In patients without restenosis, the exercise duration after percutaneous coronary intervention was significantly longer (460 +/- 154 vs 381 +/- 145 s, P = 0.008). Only the exercise duration permitted us to identify patients with and without restenosis or a new lesion.

Highlights

  • The American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association guidelines for exercise testing suggest that functional testing should not be performed routinely in all patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1]

  • A major clinical problem is the noninvasive detection of restenosis among asymptomatic patients, because silent ischemia has been reported to be a predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease [2,3,4,5]

  • Restenosis and/or new stenosis was detected by Coronary angiography (CA) in 46 patients (55%) 6 months after PCI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association guidelines for exercise testing suggest that functional testing should not be performed routinely in all patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [1]. A major clinical problem is the noninvasive detection of restenosis among asymptomatic patients, because silent ischemia has been reported to be a predictor of mortality and cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease [2,3,4,5]. Coronary angiography (CA) has been traditionally used as the gold standard for detecting restenosis. The cost and invasive nature of angiography have prompted the search for a simpler noninvasive test that could reliably detect restenosis. The standard exercise treadmill test (ETT) is safe, simple, and the most readily available of these tests. Previous studies on the value of ETT for detecting restenosis have yielded conflicting results [6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call