Abstract
In this paper, the current guidelines on exercise for physical fitness are examined, and important issues that may influence the updating of the ACSM exercise statement are identified. The current ACSM position stand (1990) on exercise for fitness has been criticized for failing to emphasize that health benefits may result from participation in lower intensity/volume physical activities. The primary difference between exercise prescription for fitness and physical activity for health is that fitness-oriented programs encompass health benefits, whereas guidelines designed specifically to elicit health benefits often do not incorporate the intensity or volume of training necessary to bring about improved fitness. Research is needed to provide more precise recommendations concerning the progression of training and how much should be included in warm-up and cool-down periods. Current and future guidelines will continue to emphasize factors that result in permanent lifestyle change and encourage a lifetime of physical activity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
